Keep track of KPIs
Keeping track of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) help organisations track and monitor progress. It aligns employees’ performance with the long-term strategic goals of the organisation and determines whether you are moving in the right direction.
Streamline goal tracking with Balanced Scorecard and KPI Bowling Chart
Align organisational actions and goals. Keep track of goals and actions by continuously analysing KPIs. Organisations can ensure progress by keeping track of trends with all your KPIs.


Analyse and monitor KPIs associated with each strategic goal and measure their performance. Organisation will realise where they are now and what needs to be done to achieve the long or short term goals.
Align your strategy with real-time KPI tracking
Set daily, weekly, and monthly KPIs for better strategy management and execution. The dashboard shows weekly KPIs, Goal versus Actual, Variance, Variance Percentage and responsible person for each KPIs.


Organise your KPIs into relevant categories, such as FCIL, SQDCP, SQDC, SQDCL and many more. Navigate and understand different aspects of the organisation's performance. Analyse trends and identify areas of improvement. Establish benchmarks and target values for each KPI. Monitor and compare progress against set objectives. Improve your business performance with informed decisions.
- Visually engaging dashboards
- Quickly learn trends and variations in performance
- Set up real-time alerts to detect anomalies
- Use historical data to make early warning signs
- Automate notifications to relevant stakeholders
- Integrate KPIs into daily management practices for proactive decision-making.
Generate and disseminate comprehensive KPI reports directly. Users can effortlessly create KPI reports with just a few clicks. Customise KPI reports by selecting specific KPIs, date ranges, visualisation formats, and other relevant parameters. Share generated KPI reports with relevant team members or stakeholders, fostering collaboration and facilitating discussions around performance metrics.

Start monitoring KPIs using Data Point Bowling Charts.
Choice of industry leaders and Fortune 500 companies








































































Drive performance excellence with Data Point’s KPI Scorecard Software
Seamless tracking
Monitor and manage KPIs across daily, weekly, and monthly intervals to ensure consistent goal alignment.
Customisable dashboards
Tailor KPI categories, reports, and visualisations to fit your unique organisational needs.
Proactive decision-making
Use real-time alerts and trend analysis to detect anomalies early and make informed decisions effortlessly.
Experience real-time KPI dashboards in action
KPI Bowling Chart: The Complete Guide to Tracking Goals, Variance and Performance
Learn how KPI Bowling Chart software helps organisations track goals vs actuals, monitor variance, assign accountability, automate alerts, analyse trends, and turn performance gaps into actionable improvements.
Why track Variance and Variance Percentage separately, rather than just one or the other?
Variance shows the raw gap between goal and actual, in whatever unit the KPI is measured in. Variance Percentage shows that same gap relative to the target. The two numbers can tell very different stories depending on the size of the target itself.
A variance of ten units looks identical on a bowling chart whether the target was 20 or 2,000. The variance percentage separates those two situations immediately, showing one as a 50% miss and the other as a 0.5% miss. Displaying both side by side means a reviewer does not have to mentally calculate which underperforming KPI represents the more serious gap. The chart does that scaling automatically, which matters most when comparing multiple KPIs with very different target sizes on the same view.
How do automated notifications to stakeholders change the speed of response compared to a bowling chart that only alerts on next login?
A bowling chart that flags an anomaly only when someone happens to open the dashboard is dependent on that person's login habits, not on the actual urgency of the deviation. A KPI that turns red at 9am is only acted on whenever the responsible person next checks the screen, which could be hours later.
Automated notifications remove that dependency. The relevant stakeholder is alerted directly when an anomaly is detected, rather than needing to discover it themselves. This shortens the gap between a KPI moving off target and someone finding out about it, which is exactly the window where an early response makes the most difference.
How does organising KPIs into categories like FCIL, SQDCP, SQDC, and SQDCL on a single bowling chart help when reviewing performance across different frameworks simultaneously?
Different departments or sites within the same organisation sometimes run different management framework structures, whether that reflects historical practice, industry convention, or a phased rollout across multiple locations. A leader overseeing several of these simultaneously needs a way to review them without switching between entirely separate reporting formats for each.
Categorising KPIs by framework on the same bowling chart means a leader can move between an FCIL view and an SQDC view within the same tool, rather than needing separate systems for sites running different frameworks. This is particularly useful during a multi-site standardisation effort, where some sites may still be operating under a legacy framework while others have moved to a newer one.
How does customising a KPI report by date range and visualisation format support sharing the same underlying data with different audiences?
A single fixed report format forces every recipient into the same level of detail and the same visual style, regardless of what they need from it. A board member and an operational team lead reviewing the same KPI often need different date ranges and different levels of visual detail to make sense of the same underlying figures.
Being able to select specific KPIs, date ranges, and visualisation formats when generating a report means the same bowling chart data can repackaged for each audience without maintaining separate manual reports. This is what makes the KPI reporting process practical for organisations sharing performance data with multiple stakeholder groups who each need a different lens on the same numbers.
How does displaying a responsible person against each KPI on the bowling chart change what happens during a review?
A KPI shown without an assigned owner on the same view invites a review meeting to spend time establishing who should be answering for it before any actual discussion of the number can happen. That ambiguity costs time in every single review where it comes up.
Showing the responsible person directly alongside the KPI, goal, actual, and variance means the review can move straight to the substance. Everyone in the room already knows who is accountable for that specific figure before the conversation starts. This is a small structural detail, but it removes a recurring source of friction in KPI reviews that otherwise happens meeting after meeting.
How does using historical data for early warning signs differ from simply reacting to the current variance figure?
The current variance on a bowling chart tells you where a KPI stands today. It does not tell you whether that position is part of a developing pattern or an isolated blip. Reacting only to the current figure treats every deviation the same way, regardless of whether it is the first sign of trouble or a one-off fluctuation.
Comparing the current figure against historical trend data changes that. A KPI that has been steadily narrowing its gap to target over recent weeks and shows one slightly worse reading is a different situation from a KPI that has been drifting further from target for the same period. Using history to interpret the current number is what turns the bowling chart from a snapshot into an early warning tool
How does the versatility of the bowling chart format extend beyond manufacturing to government and non-profit organisations?
The bowling chart format, Goal vs Actual with variance tracked over daily, weekly, and monthly intervals, is not inherently tied to production metrics. It works equally well for any KPI that has a defined target and a measurable actual, regardless of the sector generating the data.
For a government agency or a non-profit, the KPI being tracked might be service delivery times or programme outcomes rather than units produced, but the underlying structure of comparing planned against actual and flagging the variance functions identically. This is what makes the same bowling chart format applicable well outside the manufacturing context it is most associated with.
How does the bowling chart connect to the action planning and management layers it feeds into?
A bowling chart on its own shows status. It does not resolve underperformance by displaying it. The value of surfacing a red KPI depends entirely on what happens after it is flagged, which is a function of the systems the bowling chart connects to, not the chart itself.
Once a KPI is flagged as off target on the bowling chart, the response depends on KPI action plans to assign ownership and track corrective steps, and on broader KPI management to keep that KPI's definition and targets properly maintained over time. The bowling chart is the visibility layer. The management and action planning layers are where the visibility gets converted into a resolved problem.
Hear it from our customers
Get access to Data Point’s KPI bowling dashboards
Data Point lets you streamline your strategy execution and goal tracking with powerful dashboards, real-time KPI insights, and automated reporting.


